I have always been interested in what has become known as 'upcycling', but I am not sure quite what started me off on this particular post. I think it was a particularly provocative image of Lady Gaga on Inhabitat, and the accompanying article about the difficulty of properly defining the concept.
Lady Gaga's indulgent 'look at me' statement of a dress, made of suspiciously white bleached coffee filters, is actually a rather trite example from the fashion world. But that should not distract from the discussion of very real issues seeking to distinguish the relevant concepts. In her case, the proper terminology to describe that dress might be 'repurposing', a value neutral term that covers all kinds of uses of ready made products to solve problems for which they may not have been originally intended. As the Inhabitat article points out, Lady Gaga's dress only really qualifies as 'upcycling' (raising value, sometimes of waste to craft object) because anything designed by Gareth Pugh and worn by the chanteuse, is automatically of very high value to a very esoteric crowd.
Lady Gaga's indulgent 'look at me' statement of a dress, made of suspiciously white bleached coffee filters, is actually a rather trite example from the fashion world. But that should not distract from the discussion of very real issues seeking to distinguish the relevant concepts. In her case, the proper terminology to describe that dress might be 'repurposing', a value neutral term that covers all kinds of uses of ready made products to solve problems for which they may not have been originally intended. As the Inhabitat article points out, Lady Gaga's dress only really qualifies as 'upcycling' (raising value, sometimes of waste to craft object) because anything designed by Gareth Pugh and worn by the chanteuse, is automatically of very high value to a very esoteric crowd.
